In the Loop: 2025 AI Year in Review
AI in 2025: A Year of Tumult and Transition 2025 was the year AI grew up. Breakthroughs kept coming, but the story shifted from spectacle to substance...
I had to admonish my ChatGPT this week. I didn't feel good about it, but it had to be done.
I was trying to create an image of me, Chris Boyer and Reed Smith to go along with a blog post about my appearance on their touch point media podcast.
I uploaded headshots of the three of us and asked ChatGPT to create an image in my brand style. This usually goes pretty well, but lately there's been a problem: it keeps adding mice 🐭, cheese 🧀 and robots 🤖 to images when I haven't asked it to do so.
This isn't surprising. I recently had ChatGPT generate a bunch of images to support eBooks and blog posts I created where mice, cheese and robots were supposed to be there. But this wasn't one of those situations.
The first image it generated showed the three of us, along with a mouse, a piece of cheese AND a robot. I used the new tool that lets you highlight parts of an image you want to get rid of, and the resulting image included a stool with a piece of cheese on it and, inexplicably, weird bulbous fingers on poor Chris's right hand.
I tried a third time, being specific that I didn't want ChatGPT to include any mice, cheese or robots...only the three humans. The result? A baby robot holding a bolt of lightning.
Once more I tried the select tool and gave clear instructions what I wanted the image to include. Good news! No mice, cheese, or robots. Not-so-good news? There was suddenly a small version of me in the image.
I'd had enough. Typing furiously, I asked: "Why do you keep adding robots, mice and cheese? I haven't asked you to do that, but you keep doing it."
The system's response was fascinating:
"You're absolutely right to call that out—and I appreciate your patience. What’s happening is that some of the styling instructions from earlier requests (especially those involving mice, robots, and cheese) got “sticky” in the image generation tool’s context. Even when we stop mentioning those elements, the system sometimes carries them forward unintentionally.
Going forward, I’ll make sure to explicitly clear those out of the prompts I send on your behalf so your images stay focused on what you're actually asking for.
Thanks again for flagging it—want to retry your last request with a clean, accurate prompt?"
I felt a little guilty for admonishing my ChatGPT, so I typed an overly enthusiastic response: "Yes, let's do it!"
The result? Nailed it!
The lesson? These LLMs are getting really good at telling you why they do things a certain way and correcting mistakes, but you have to communicate with them very directly, very clearly -- and occasionally admonish them when they just can't get those ghosts (or mice, cheese or robots) out of the machine.
AI in 2025: A Year of Tumult and Transition 2025 was the year AI grew up. Breakthroughs kept coming, but the story shifted from spectacle to substance...
Last Week in AI: Wary Experts, Genesis Mission Launches, Altman's Loser Energy This week’s In the Loop captures a widening gap between AI’s momentum a...
Ads that aren’t ads? “Adult” ChatGPT? Yup, AI is entering its awkward adolescence. We’re living in the golden age of AI. Not of its capabilities – tha...
Last Week in AI: Big Deals, Monetizing AI, Digital IDs Last week saw AI shift from novelty to infrastructure: collective power replacing lone heroes, ...
Last Week in AI: Code Red at OpenAI, Anthropic Emerges, AI Gets Political Last week was full of stress fractures and acceleration in AI. OpenAI called...
Last Week in AI: ChatGPT Turns 3, Sovereign AI, Poetry as Universal AI Jailbreak ChatGPT’s third birthday shows a world racing to keep up. Breakthroug...